Research papers

Stakeholders’ perception towards ecosystem services provided by forests: comparison among three Balkans countries


The stakeholders’ involvement in forest management is a key point to facilitate the exchange of information between decision makers and the local community, to reduce conflicts between forest users, and to increase social acceptance of decisions made. The aims of the present study are to identify the stakeholders’ preferences towards ecosystem services provided by forests and to analyze the impacts of forest management practices on ecosystem services in the Balkan region. To achieve these aims a face-to-face survey was conducted in three study areas in the Balkans: Shkrel district in Albania; Rugova valley in Kosovo; Knjazevac municipality in Serbia. The three study areas are in a rural context and they are characterized by strong linkages between the local community and natural resources. The questionnaire – provided as a digital application – was administered to a representative sample of stakeholders in each pilot area. The stakeholders were selected among four main groups of interest: public administrations; environmental NGOs, tourism promoters, and private actors of forest-wood chain. The results show that for the Balkan respondents the most important ecosystem services are supporting services (lifecycle maintenance, habitats protection), followed by provisioning services (wood for manufacturing, fuelwood, water supply).


public participation; stakeholders’ involvement; questionnaire survey; Rugova valley (Kosovo); Shkrel district (Albania); Knjaževac municipality (Serbia)

Full Text:




Adelana S.M.A., Abiye T.A., Nkhuwa D.C.W., Tindimugaya C., Oga M.S. 2008 - Urban groundwater management and protection in Sub-Saharan Africa. In: Adelana S., MacDonald A. (eds), Applied groundwater in Africa. New York: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.

Adem Esmail B., Geneletti D., Christian A. 2017 - Boundary work for implementing adaptive management: A water sector application. Science of the Total Environment 1: 274-285.

Arnstein S.R. 1969 - A ladder of citizen participation. American Institute of Planners Journal 35: 216–224.

Blattert C., Lemm R., Thees O., Lexer M.J., Hanewinkel M. 2017 - Management of ecosystem services in mountain forests: Review of indicators and value functions for model based multi-criteria decision analysis. Ecological Indicators 79: 391-409.

Chan K.M.A., Satterfield T., Goldstein J. 2012 - Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics 74: 8-18.

Chavez M.D., Berentsen P.B.M., Oude Lansink A.G.J.M. 2012 - Assessment of criteria and farming activities for tobacco diversification using the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique. Agricultural Systems 111: 53-62.

Chess C. 2000 - Evaluating Environmental Public Participation: Methodological Questions. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 6: 769-784.

Clark W.C., Tomich T.P., van Noordwijk M., Guston D., Cacutan D., M. Dickson N., McNie E. 2016 - Boundary work for sustainable development: Natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). PNAS 113 (17): 4615-4622.

Costanza R., d’Arge R., de Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B. et al. 1997 - The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253–260.

De Meo I., Cantiani M.G., Ferretti F., Paletto A. 2018 - Qualitative Assessment of Forest Ecosystem Services: The Stakeholders’ Point of View in Support of Landscape Planning. Forests 9: 465.

De Meo I., Paletto A., Cantiani M.G. 2015 - The attractiveness of forests: Preferences and perceptions in a mountain community in Italy. Annals of Forest Research 58 (1): 145-156.

Deniz T., Paletto A. 2018 - Effects of bioenergy production on environmental sustainability: a preliminary study based on expert opinions in Italy and Turkey. Journal of Forestry Research 29 (6): 1611-1626.

European Commission 2020 - EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. Bringing nature back into our lives. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Brussels, 20.5.2020 COM(2020) 380 final.

Filyushkina A., Agimass F., Lundhede T., Strange N., Jacobsen J.B. 2017 - Preferences for variation in forest characteristics: Does diversity between stands matter? Ecological Economics 140: 22-29.

Glück P., Avdibegović M., Čabaravdić A., Nonić D., Petrović N., Posavec S., Stojanovska M., Imočanin S., Krajter S., Lozanovska N., Marić B., Milijić V., Mrkobrada A., Trninić S. 2011 - Private Forest Owners in the Western Balkans – Ready for the Formation of Interest Associations. European Forest Institute Research Report 25, Joensuu: 133-174.

Gómez-Baggethun E., Reyes-García V., Olsson P., Montes C. 2012 - Traditional ecological knowledge and community resilience to environmental extremes: A case study in Doñana, SW Spain. Global Environmental Change 22: 640-650.

Gundersen V.S., Frivold L.H. 2008 - Public preferences for forest structures: a review of quantitative surveys from Finland, Norway and Sweden. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 7 (4): 241-258.

Häyhä T., Franzese P.P. 2014 - Ecosystem services assessment: A review under an ecological-economic and systems perspective. Ecological Modelling 289: 124-132.

Iniesta-Arandia I., García-Llorente M., Aguilera P.A., Montes C., Martín-López B. 2014 - Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services: uncovering the links between values, drivers of change, and human well-being. Ecological economics 108: 36-48.

Jones P., Burgess J., Bhattachary D. 2000 - An evaluation of approaches for promoting relevant authority and stakeholder participation in European Marine Sites in the UK. Draft Report, Environment and Society Research Unit.

KAS 2017 - Water statistics 2017. Technical report, Kosovo Agency of Statistics. Pristina.

Koci S.A. 2014 - Review of the Forestry Sector in Albania. University of Padova. Environmental Economics Report.

Kottek M., Grieser J., Beck C., Rudolf B., Rubel F. 2006 - World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 15 (3): 259-263.

Lamarque P., Tappeiner U., Turner C., Steinbacher M., Bardgett R.D., Szukics U., Schermer M., Lavorel S. 2011 - Stakeholder perceptions of grassland ecosystem services in relation to knowledge on soil fertility and biodiversity. Regional Environmental Change 11: 791–804.

Maes J., Teller A., Erhard M., Grizzetti B., Barredo J.I., Paracchini M.L., Condé S., Somma F., Orgiazzi A., Jones A., Zulian A., Vallecilo S., Petersen J.E., Marquardt D., Kovacevic V., Abdul Malak D., Marin A.I., Czúcz B., Mauri A., Loffler P., Bastrup-Birk A., Biala K., Christiansen T., Werner B. 2018 - Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services: An analytical framework for ecosystem condition. Publications office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

Martínez Pastur G., Peri P.L., Lencinas M.V., García-Llorente M., Martín-López B. 2016 - Spatial patterns of cultural ecosystem services provision in Southern Patagonia. Landscape Ecology 31 (2): 383-399.

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005 - Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.

Nikodinoska N., Paletto A., Pastorella F., Granvik M., Franzese P.P. 2018 - Assessing, valuing and mapping ecosystem services at city level: The case of Uppsala (Sweden). Ecological Modelling 368: 411-424.

Oteros-Rozas E., Martín-López B., González J.A., Plieninger T., López C.A., Montes C. 2014 - Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services in a transhumance social-ecological network. Regional Environmental Change 14: 1269-1289.

Paletto A., De Meo I., Cantiani M.G., Maino F. 2013 - Social perceptions and forest management strategies in an Italian alpine community. Mountain Research and Development 33(2): 152-160.

Paletto A., Geitner C., Grilli G., Hastik R., Pastorella F., Rodrìguez Garcìa L. 2015 - Mapping the value of ecosystem services: A case study from the Austrian Alps. Annals of Forest Research 58 (1): 157-175.

Paletto A., Guerrini S., De Meo I. 2017 - Exploring visitors' perceptions of silvicultural treatments to increase the destination attractiveness of peri-urban forests: A case study in Tuscany Region (Italy). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 27: 314-323.

Pardos M., Pérez S., Calama R., Alonso R., Lexer M.J. 2016 - Ecosystem service provision, management systems and climate change in Valsaín forest, central Spain. Regional Environmental Change 17 (1): 17-32.

Pelyukh O., Paletto A., Zahvoyska L. 2019 - Comparison between people’s perceptions and preferences towards forest stand characteristics in Italy and Ukraine. Annals of Silvicultural Research 43 (1): 4-14.

Pieratti E., Paletto A., De Meo I., Fagarazzi C., Rillo Migliorini Giovannini M. 2019 - Assessing the forest- wood chain at local level: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) based on the circular bioeconomy principles. Annals of Forest Research 62 (1): 123-138.

Pimbert M.P., Pretty J.N. 1997 - Parks, people and professionals: putting ’participation’ into protected-area management. In: Ghimire K.B., Pimbert M.P. (eds.) Social Change and Conservation: Environmental Politics and Impacts of National Parks and Protected Areas. Earthscan Publications Limited, London: 297-330.

Proskurina S., Sikkema R., Heinimö J., Vakkilainen E. 2016 - Five years left e How are the EU member states contributing to the 20% target for EU's renewable energy consumption; the role of woody biomass. Biomass & Bioenergy 95: 64-77.

Rodríguez García L., Curetti G., Garegnani G., Grilli G., Pastorella F., Paletto A. 2016 - La valoración de los servicios ecosistémicos en los ecosistemas forestales: un caso de estudio en Los Alpes Italianos. Bosque 37 (1): 41-52.

Sadok W., Angevin F., Bergez J.-É., Bockstaller C., Colom B., Guichard L., Reau R., Doré T. 2008 - Exante assessment of the sustainability of alternative cropping systems: implications for using multi-criteria decision-aid methods. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 28: 163–174.

Siebrand S. 2006 - Participatory forest management in conflict situations. A case study in Swedish Lapland. Umeå: Master thesis Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.

Stanisic M., Jovic D., Dragan Nonic D. 2005 - Legal similarities and differences of environmental protection and forestry in West Balkan countries. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium “Legal Aspects of European Forest Sustainable Development”, Zlatibor Mountain, Serbia.

Stürck J., Poortinga A., Verburg P.H. 2014 - Mapping ecosystem services: the supply and demand of flood regulation services in Europe. Ecological Indicators 38: 198–211.

Summers J.K., Smith L.M., Case J.L., Linthurst R.A. 2012 - A Review of the Elements of Human Well-Being with an Emphasis on the Contribution of Ecosystem Service. Ambio 41 (4): 327-340.

Tabbush P. 2004 - Public money for public good? Public participation in forest planning. Forestry 2: 145-156.

UNECE 1998 - Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), 25 June 1998 Aarhus (Demark).

Vacik H., Lexer M.J. 2014 - Past, current and future drivers for the development of decision support systems in forest management. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 29: 2–19.

Vihervaara P., Kumpula T., Tanskanen A., Burkhard B. 2010 - Ecosystem services –a tool for sustainable management of human–environment systems. Case study Finnish Forest Lapland. Ecological Complexity 7: 410–420.

Yan Y., Zhao C., Wang C., Shan P., Zhang Y., Wu G. 2016 - Ecosystem health assessment of the Liao River Basin upstream region based on ecosystem services. Acta Ecologica Sinica 36 (4): 294-300.

Copyright (c) 2021 Marta Crivellaro, Maurizio Camin, Giacomo Colle, Marco Bezzi, Alessandro Paletto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

All texts reported in and all materials directly downloadable from this page are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.