Research papers

Comparison between people's perceptions and preferences towards forest stand characteristics in Italy and Ukraine


Understanding people’s perceptions and preferences towards forest stand characteristics can bring many benefits to forest managers in the short term. This study aims to identify and compare people’s perception and preferences of forest stand characteristics in Trentino province (Italy) and Rakhiv region (Ukraine). These regions were chosen as study areas for two main reasons: both are in mountain areas and local communities are strictly dependent on the forest resource. Data were collected through a questionnaire administered to a sample of local people. The collected data were statistically analysed to highlight the preferred type of forests related to different stand characteristics. The results of comparative analysis confirmed the importance of socio-demographic characteristics in shaping respondents’ preferences. The results show that respondents in both case studies prefer mixed forests with a random distribution of trees with different diameter sizes. However, respondents from Trentino province prefer open forests, while respondents from Rakhiv region prefer closed one. The present study increased the level of knowledge about people's preferences in Italy and Ukraine for different forest stand characteristics. This information can be used by decision makers (forest managers and planners) to improve the recreational attractiveness of forest stands.


analysis of perceptions; partecipatory forest management; questionnaire survey; Trentino province (Italy); Rakhiv region (Ukraine)

Full Text:




Brown G., Reed P. 2000 - Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning. Forest Science 46 (2): 240-247.

Buckingham-Hatfield S. 2000 - Gender and environment. Routledge, London. 137 p.

Cantiani M.G. 2012 - Forest planning and public participation: A possible methodological approach. iForest-Biogeoscienes and Forestry 5 (2): 72-82. doi: 10.3832/ifor0602-009

Cantiani M.G., Bettelini D., Mariotta S. 2002 - Participatory forest planning: A chance of communication between forest service and local communities. In: Büchel M., Nipkow F., Güntensperger M., (Eds.). Forestry Meets the Public: Seminar and Workshop Proceedings. Bern, Switzerland: Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape: 249-263.

Carlson A. 2001 - Aesthetic preferences for sustainable landscapes: seeing and knowing. In: Sheppard S.R.J., Harshaw H.W. (Eds.), Forest and Landscapes. Linking Ecology, Sustainability and Aesthetics. IUFRO Research Series, No. 6. CAB International, Oxon UK: 31-41.

Daniel T.D. 2001 - Aesthetic preference and ecological sustainability. In: Sheppard, S.R.J., Harshaw, H.W. (Eds.), Forest and Landscapes. Linking Ecology, Sustainability and Aesthetics. IUFRO Research Series, No. 6. CAB International, Oxon UK: 15-29.

de Leeuw E.D. 1992 - Data Quality in Mail, Telephone and Face to Face Surveys. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, Amsterdam. 125 p.

Edwards D.M., Jay M., Jensen F.S., Lucas B., Marzano M., Montagne´ C., Peace A., Weiss G. 2012 - Public preferences for structural attributes of forests: Towards a pan-European perspective. Forest Policy and Economics 19: 12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.07.006

ENPI EAST FLEG ІІ. 2015 - National report on Forest products dependence of rural communities in Ukraine. [Online] Available: [Data accessed 31 October 2018].

Fahey R.T., Alveshere B.C., Burton J.I., D'Amato A.W., Dickinson Y.L., Keeton W.S. & Saunders M. R. 2018 - Shifting conceptions of complexity in forest management and silviculture. Forest Ecology and Management 421: 59-71. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.01.011

Filyushkina A., Agimass F., Lundhede T., Strange N., Jacobsen J.B. 2017 - Preferences for variation in forest characteristics: Does diversity between stands matter? Ecological Economics 140: 22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.010

Gandolfo C., Comin P. 2017 – Servizio Foreste e Fauna. Relazione sull’attività svolta nel 2016. Provincia autonoma di Trento. Servizio foreste e fauna, Trento.

Giergiczny M., Czajkowski M., Żylicz T., Angelstam P. 2015 - Choice experiment assessment of public preferences for forest structural attributes. Ecological Economics 119: 8-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.032

Gobster P.H. 1999 - An ecological aesthetic for forest landscape management. Landscape Journal 18: 54-64. doi: 10.3368/lj.18.1.54

Goyder J. 1985 - Face-to-face interviews and mailed questionnaires: the net difference in response rate. The Public Opinion Quartely 49 (2): 243-252. doi: 10.1086/268917

Grilli G., Paletto A., De Meo I. 2014 - Economic valuation of forest recreation in an Alpine valley. Baltic Forestry 20 (1): 167-175.

Grilli G., Jonkisz J., Ciolli M., Lesinski J. 2016 - Mixed forests and ecosystem services: investigating stakeholders’ perceptions in a case study in the Polish Carpathians. Forest Policy and Economics 66: 11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.02.003

Gundersen V.S., Frivold L.H. 2008 - Public preferences for forest structures: a review of quantitative surveys from Finland, Norway and Sweden. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 7 (4): 241-258. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2008.05.001

Heer C., Rusterholz H.P., Baur B. 2003 - Forest perception and knowledge of hikers and mountain bikers in two different areas in northwestern Switzerland. Environmental Management 31: 709-723. doi: 10.1007/s00267-003-3002-x

Heyman E. 2012 - Analysing recreational values and management effects in an urban forest with the visitor-employed photography method. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 11: 267-277. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.02.003.

Jankovska I., Straupe I., Brumelis G., Donis J., Kupfere L. 2014 - Urban forests of Riga, Latvia −pressures, naturalness, attitudes and management. Baltic Forestry 20 (2): 342-351.

Jensen F.S. 1999 - Forest recreation in Denmark from the 1970s to the 1990s. The Research Series: 26. Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute, Hoersholm, Denmark. 166 p.

Jensen F.S. 1993 - Landscape managers’ and politicians’ perception of the forest and landscape preferences of the population. Forest and Landscape Research 1 (1): 79-93.

Jensen F.S., Koch N.E. 1998 - Measuring forest preferences of the population: A Danish approach. In: Terrasson D., editor. Public Perception and Attitudes of Forest Owners Towards Forest in Europe [in French]. Commentaires et syntheses du groupe de travail COST E3-WG1, 1994/1998. Antony, France: Cemagref e´ditions: 39–82.

Kaplan R., Kaplan S. 1989 - The Experience of Nature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 370 p.

Kumar S., Kant S. 2007 - Exploded logit modeling of stakeholders’ preferences for multiple forest values. Forestry Policy and Economics 9 (5): 516-526. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2006.03.001

Lee T.R. 2001 - Perceptions, Attitudes and Preferences in Forests and Woodlands. Technical Paper 18. Edinburgh, United Kingdom: Forestry Commission. 166 p.

Lewis J.L., Sheppard S.R.J. 2005 - Ancient values, new challenges: Indigenous spiritual perceptions of landscapes and forest management. Society & Natural Resources 18: 907-920. doi: 10.1080/08941920500205533

Likert R. 1932 - A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology 22 (140): 1-55.

Lindhagen A. 1996 - Forest recreation in Sweden. Four case studies using quantitative and qualitative methods. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Environmental Forestry, Uppsala. 109 p.

Melnykovych M., Nijnik M., Soloviy I., Nijnik A., Sarkki S., Bihun Y. 2018. Social-ecological innovation in remote mountain areas: Adaptive responses of forest-dependent communities to the challenges of a changing world. Science of The Total Environment 613: 894-906. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.065

Mill G.A., Van Rensburg T.M., Hynes S., Dooley C. 2007 - Preferences for multiple use forest management in Ireland: Citizen and consumer perpectives. Ecological Economics 60 (3): 642-653. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.005

Misgav A. 2000 - Visual preference of the public for vegetation groups in Israel. Landscape and Urban Planning 48: 143-159. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00038-4

Nielsen A.B., Olsenb S.B., Lundhede T. 2007 - An economic valuation of the recreational benefits associated with nature-based forest management practices. Landscape and Urban Planning 80: 63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.06.003

Nijnik A., Nijnik M., Kopiy S., Zahvoyska L., Sarkki S., Kopiy L., Miller D. 2017 - Identifying and understanding attitudinal diversity on multi-functional changes in woodlands of the Ukrainian Carpathians. Climate Research 73 (1-2): 45-56. doi: 10.3354/cr01448

Notaro S., Paletto A. 2011 - Links between mountain communities and environmental services in the Italian Alps. Sociologia Ruralis 5: 137-157. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00532.x

Odasso M., Miori M., Gandolfo C. 2018 - I tipi forestali del Trentino: descrizione e aspetti dinamici. Provincia autonoma di Trento. Servizio foreste e fauna, Trento.

Oliynyk Ya., Zapototsky S., Braichevsky Yu., Galagan O. 2015 - Rakhiv district: nature, population, economy. Kiev, Kiev Polytechnic University. 254 p. [in Ukrainian with English summary].

Paletto A., Cantiani M. G., De Meo I. 2015 - Public Participation in Forest Landscape Management Planning (FLMP) in Italy. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 34 (5): 465-482. doi: 10.1080/10549811.2015.1026447

Paletto A., De Meo I., Cantiani M.G., Maino F. 2013 - Social perceptions and forest management strategies in an Italian alpine community. Mountain Research and Development 33 (2): 152-160. doi: 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-12-00115.1

Paletto A., Ferretti F., Cantiani P., De Meo I. 2012a - Multi-functional approach in forest landscape management planning: an application in Southern Italy. Forest systems 21(1): 68-80. doi: 10.5424/fs/2112211-11066

Paletto A., Maino F., De Meo I., Ferretti F. 2012b - Perception of Forest Values in the Alpine Community of Trentino Region (Italy). Environmental Management 8: 414-422. doi: 10.1007/s00267-012-9974-7

Pastorella F., Avdagić A., Cabaravdić A., Osmanović M., Paletto A. 2014 - Does mountain forest characteristics influence visual appeal? A study case in an Alpine Valley in Italy. In: Proceedings International Conference Natural Resources, Green Technology & Sustainable Development. 26th-28th November 2014, Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology, University of Zagreb, Croatia.

Pelyukh O., Zahvoyska L. 2018 - Investigation of Lviv region population’s preferences regarding recreational forest using choice experiment method. Scientific Bulletin of UNFU 28 (9): 73-80. [in Ukrainian with English summary].

Pelyukh O., Zahvoyska L., Maksymiv L. 2018 - Analysis of stakeholders’ interaction in the context of secondary Norway spruce stands conversion in the Ukrainian Carpathians. In: Proceedings of the IUFRO unit 4.05.00 International symposium. Zagreb, 10-12 May: 22-24.

Ribe R.G. 1989 - The aesthetics of forestry: what has empirical preference research taught us? Journal of Environmental Management 13: 55-74. doi: 10.1007/BF01867587

Rockström J., Steffen W. et al. 2009 - Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society 14 (2): 32-64. doi: 10.5751/ES-03180-140232

Roovers P., Merny M., Gulinck H. 2002 - Visitor profile, perceptions and expectations in forests from a gradient of increasing urbanisation in central Belgium. Landscape and Urban Planning 59 (3): 129-145. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00011-7.

Sheppard S.R.J., Meitner M. 2005 - Using multi-criteria analysis and visualisation for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups. Forest Ecology and Management 207: 171-187. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.032.

Šišák L. 2011 - Forest visitors’ opinions on the importance of forest operations, forest functions and sources of their financing. Journal of Forest Science 57: 266-270.

Soloviy I., Chernyavskyy M., Genyk Ya. 2011 – Environmental, economic and social impact of inefficient and unsustainable forest practices and illegal logging in Ukraine. Liga-Press, Lviv. 396 p. [in Ukrainian with English summary].

Soloviy I., Melnykovych M. 2014 - Contribution of forestry to wellbeing of mountain forest dependent communities’ in the Ukrainian Carpathians. In: Proceedings of the Forestry Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Collection of Research Papers 12: 233-241.

Steffen W., Richardson K., Rockstrom J., Cornell S.E., Fetzer I., Bennett E.M., Biggs R., Carpenter S.R., de Vries W., de Witt C.A., Folke C., Gerten D., Heincke J., Mace G.M., Persson L.M., Ramanathan V., Reyers B., Sorlin S. 2015 - Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347 (6223): 736-746. doi: 10.1126/science.1259855

Tahvanainen L., Tyrväinen L., Ihalainen M., Vuorela N., Kolehmainen O. 2011 - Forest management and public perceptions – visual versus verbal information. Landscape and Urban Planning 53: 53-70. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00137-7

Tarrant M.A., Cordell H.K. 2002 - Amenity values of public and private forests: examining the value-attitude relationship. Environmental Management 30 (5): 692-703. doi: 10.1007/s00267-002-2722-7

The Global Risks Report 2018. 13th Edition. World Economic Forum, Geneva. 80 p.

Tyrväinen L., Silvennoinen H., Kolehmainen O. 2003 - Ecological and aesthetic values in urban forest management. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 1 (3): 135-149. doi: 10.1078/1618-8667-00014

Waters C.N., Zalasiewicz J. et al. 2016 - The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene. Science 351 (6269): p. aad2622. doi: 10.1126/science.aad2622

Zahvoyska L., Bas T. 2013 - Stakeholders’ perceptions of mountain forest ecosystem services: the Ukrainian Carpathians case study. The Carpathians: Integrating Nature and Society Towards Sustainability Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg: 353-367.

Zahvoyska L., Pelyukh O., Maksymiv L. 2017 - Methodological considerations and their application for evaluation of benefits from the conversion of even-age secondary Norway spruce stands into mixed uneven-aged woodlands with a focus on the Ukrainian Carpathians. Austrian Journal of Forest Science 134: 251-281.

Zahvoyska L.D. 2014 - Theoretical approaches to determining economic value of forest ecosystems services: benefits of pure stands transformation into mixed stands. In: Proceedings of the Forestry Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Collection of Research Papers 12: 201-209. [in Ukrainian with English summary].

Copyright (c) 2019 Oksana Pelyhukh, Alessandro Paletto, Lyudmyla Zahvoyska

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

All texts reported in and all materials directly downloadable from this page are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.